FIELD GUIDE #3 

Product Design: Accessibility & Inclusivity Checklist

Leverage a high-level checklist to ensure your product meets WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance and improves inclusivity for all users.

Last updated: Mar 7, 2025

1. WCAG 2.1 AA Standards

Many organizations have already committed to WCAG 2.1 AA compliance as part of their country’s legal requirements.

WCAG 2.1 AA was built on 4 core principles: perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust.

Attempting to be compliant to WCAG 2.1 AA guidelines can be overwhelming and hard to understand, especially when designing quickly.

Use this simple, high-level checklist and the relevant details of each section to drive improvements.

Is the page meaningful..

…without color?

1.4.1 Use of Color (A) (2.0)

…without images?

1.1.1 Non-text Content (A) (2.0)

1.4.5 Images of Text (AA) (2.0)

2.4.2 Page Titled (A) (2.0)

2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) (A) (2.0)

2.5.3 Label in Name (A) (2.1)

3.1.1 Language of Page (AA) (2.0)

3.1.2 Language of Parts (AA) (2.0)

3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (A) (2.0)

4.1.1 Parsing (A) (2.0)

4.1.3 Status Messages (AA) (2.1)

…without sound?

1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) (A) (2.0)

1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) (A) (2.0)

1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) (A) (2.0)

1.2.4 Captions (Live) (AA) (2.0)

1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) (AA) (2.0)

1.4.2 Audio Control (A) (2.0)

Does a user know when they’re making a mistake…

…without visuals?

1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics (A) (2.0)

1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose (AA) (2.1)

3.3.1 Error Identification (A) (2.0)

3.3.3 Error Suggestion (AA) (2.0)

…without animation?

2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold (a) (2.0)

2.5.4 Motion Actuation (A) (2.1)

…with the option to recover after making a mistake?

2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation (A) (2.1)

Does the page have sufficient contrast?

1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (AA) (2.0)

1.4.11 Non-text Contrast (AA) (2.1)

Is the content order and context meaningful?

1.3.1 Info and Relationship (A) (2.0)

1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence (A) (2.0)

1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus (AA) (2.1)

2.4.3 Focus Order (A) (2.0)

2.4.6 Headings and Labels (AA) (2.0)

3.2.3 Consistent Navigation (AA) (2.0)

Can the screen be magnified?

Can tasks be completed without voice input?

Is content meaningful without a touch screen?

1.4.4 Resize text (AA) (2.0)

1.4.10 Reflow (AA) (2.1)

2.5.1 Pointer Gestures (A) (2.1)

3.2.1 On Focus (A) (2.0)

3.2.2 On Input (A) (2.0)

2. Neurodivergence

Neurodivergence is the term for people whose brains function differently in one or more ways than is considered typical. Some common examples include autism, ADHD, dyslexia, or chronic mental health illnesses.

This section covers questions not included in WCAG standards that can be used to design better experiences for everyone, especially neurodivergent people.

Is the content easy to scan with limited distractions?

Is content short and clear with simple colors?

Is important information easy to identify?

Is typography and content simple?

Is content easy to scan?

1.4.12 Text Spacing (AA) (2.1)

2.4.1 Bypass Blocks (A) (2.0)

Is text decoration meaningful?

Is content written in plain language?

Is the content transparent and clear?

Are there explanations after completing tasks?

Can users check their work before submitting?

3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) (AA) (2.0)

Are actions descriptive?

3.2.4 Consistent Identification (AA) (2.0)

Does the user have enough time to complete an action?

2.2.1 Timing Adjustable (A) (2.0)

Is there support if users get stuck?

2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide (A) (2.0)

2.4.5 Multiple Ways (AA) (2.0)

2.4.7 Focus Visible (AA) (2.0)

4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (A) (2.0)

Are there accelerators and nudges?

3. Stereotype Threat

Stereotype threat is a situational phenomenon that arises when people face the prospect of being viewed or evaluated in light of a negative stereotype about a group to which they belong.

All people are vulnerable to stereotype threat because every individual has at least one social identity that is targeted by a negative stereotype in some situation.

People are especially vulnerable when they’re aware of a stereotype and they are engaged in a task that feels evaluative, that is challenging, or that they care about performing well.

Does the design unintentionally prime a negative stereotype?

Is any default language exclusionary?

Is any default imagery exclusionary?

Does the design encourage the user if they make a mistake?

Is there an option to submit a new response?

Are there accelerators and nudges?

Are demographic data questions phrased to reduce anxiety?

Is “prefer not to say” an option?

Is there an explanation for why need the information?

4. Technology

Digital experiences can be drastically different depending on the device someone has available. Don’t let technological limitations prevent people from having a positive experience.

Was accessibility testing integrated throughout the AI development lifecycle?

2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts (A) (2.1)

...like older devices?

...like smaller screens?

1.3.4 Orientation (AA) (2.1)

...like slower internet connections?

5. AI & Automation

Due to the rapid acceleration of AI and automation technology, its important to take create extra focus on accessibility and inclusivity.  Start with these 4 high-level recommendations, and dive deeper into considerations below.

Was accessibility testing integrated throughout the AI development lifecycle?

Did we prioritize user feedback from diverse user groups?

Bias and Inclusivity

Are there new accessibility standards and best practices for AI that we should consider?

Did we make the AI system transparent, controllable, and adaptable?

Transparency and Control

Conversational AI

Automated Content Generation

Agentic AI